ITREALMS ... making leadership SENSE with digital news!
The Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development at its Fall Meeting has urged governments, industry, academia and civil society to collaborate to support the implementation of the forthcoming UN Global Digital Compact. Taking place in New York just days before the UN's Summit of the Future, the Fall Meeting of the Commission underscored the importance of global initiatives to set a course towards a resilient, safe, and inclusive digital future. Both the Compact and the Pact for the Future are expected to be agreed at the upcoming UN Summit.
Featured post @ITREALMS
Showing posts with label enhanced. Show all posts
Showing posts with label enhanced. Show all posts
Monday, September 23, 2024
Saturday, September 14, 2024
Tecno's Phantom V fold2 5G comes with enhanced AI - ITREALMS
Sponsored@ITREALMS ... making leadership SENSE with digital news!
Innovative technology brand TECNO today unveiled the new PHANTOM V Fold2 5G – an AI-enhanced second-generation foldable smartphone that brings more efficiency for business professionals and creatives. Embracing the incredible possibilities of large-screen foldable devices, it is a powerhouse of productivity and creativity elevated by futuristic AI innovation.PHANTOM V Fold2 5G is freshly equipped with TECNO’s brand-new TECNO AI suite of AI functions, including the upgraded Gemini-integrated Ella AI Assistant, AI Artboard, AI Wallpaper and more. It also features advanced hardware, with 6.42” outer and 7.85” main 120Hz LTPO screens with 30-120° hovering capability, a powerful 5750mAh Aircell battery, 70W charging, and an Ultra-Clear Five Camera Imaging System, while it also supports the new PHANTOM V Pen stylus.
Innovative technology brand TECNO today unveiled the new PHANTOM V Fold2 5G – an AI-enhanced second-generation foldable smartphone that brings more efficiency for business professionals and creatives. Embracing the incredible possibilities of large-screen foldable devices, it is a powerhouse of productivity and creativity elevated by futuristic AI innovation.PHANTOM V Fold2 5G is freshly equipped with TECNO’s brand-new TECNO AI suite of AI functions, including the upgraded Gemini-integrated Ella AI Assistant, AI Artboard, AI Wallpaper and more. It also features advanced hardware, with 6.42” outer and 7.85” main 120Hz LTPO screens with 30-120° hovering capability, a powerful 5750mAh Aircell battery, 70W charging, and an Ultra-Clear Five Camera Imaging System, while it also supports the new PHANTOM V Pen stylus.
Tuesday, April 11, 2023
NIBF 2023 gets underway, unveils enhanced website, social media accounts - ITREALMS
ITREALMS ... making leadership SENSE with digital news!
The Nigerian International Book Fair (NIBF) has unveiled a newly enhanced website and social media accounts, reports ITREALMS.
NIBF, ITREALMS gathered, is a highly anticipated event that celebrates and promotes the literary arts in Nigeria and beyond. The event has been organized annually since 2001, and the 2023 edition is set to be one of the most exciting yet.
The Nigerian International Book Fair (NIBF) has unveiled a newly enhanced website and social media accounts, reports ITREALMS.
NIBF, ITREALMS gathered, is a highly anticipated event that celebrates and promotes the literary arts in Nigeria and beyond. The event has been organized annually since 2001, and the 2023 edition is set to be one of the most exciting yet.
Tuesday, November 05, 2019
Federal Civil Service Commission enters enhanced ‘FOI Hall of Shame’ - ITREALMS
The Media Rights Agenda (MRA) has inducted the Federal Civil Service Commission (FCSC) into its enhanced Freedom of Information (FOI) Hall of Shame and promised to take legal action against the Commission for its blatant disregard of its obligations under the FOI Act in violation of the rights of the public to information, reports ITREALMS.
FOI Programme Manager at MRA, Mr. Ridwan Sulaimon, said despite its responsibility of overseeing a huge federal civil service, the Commission has ignored virtually all its duties as a public institution as defined by the FOI Act, thereby consistently sending a wrong signal to other public institutions under its supervision with the result that, unsurprisingly, many of those public institutions and their officials have themselves repeatedly violated the provisions of the Act.
Noting that the Commission was established by section 153(1) of the 1999 Constitution(as amended) as a federal executive body empowered to appoint persons to offices in the federal civil service and to dismiss or exercise disciplinary control over persons holding such office, Mr. Sulaimon said: “This is a huge responsibility that requires the Commission, which essentially serves as the engine room of the government, to be transparent in order to protect its integrity and enjoy credibility with those it superintends over as well as to comply with all applicable laws and regulations so that it can enforce these and others laws and regulations with respect to the public institutions and officials under its supervision.
According to him, “The Commission can have no credibility in exercising disciplinary control over members of the public service for breaches of relevant laws and regulations and its efforts in this regard cannot be effective when it is itself in breach of its duties and obligations under a Law validly made by the National Assembly. The hypocrisy in such an exercise will be a major encumbrance to the performance of the Commission’s functions and the realization of its objectives.”
Mr. Sulaimon accused the Commission of failing to proactively publish the range of information and documents that it is required to disclose by the Law; refusing to designate an FOI Desk Officer; not providing the appropriate training for its officials on the public’s right of access to information and for the effective implementation of the Act; and consistently neglecting to submit to the Attorney-General of the Federation its annual FOI implementation reports, all of which are mandatory requirements of the Law.
He stressed that it was evident from the website of the Commission that it is in breach of the requirements of section 2(3)f of the FOI Act which imposes an obligation on all public institutions to proactively publish the title and address of the appropriate officer to whom applications for information under the Act should be made by members of the public.
Mr Sulaimon said: “Such level of impunity should not be tolerated in any decent society and it amazes us that a government that expects ordinary citizens and its officials to obey the law allows an institution of the government with such massive coordinating and supervisory roles to get away with such blatant disregard for a valid and subsisting law, thereby presenting an image of a lawless society and a government that condones lawlessness.”
He added that: “An approach to governance in which government officials and institutions disobey the law, sets a bad example for ordinary citizens and robs the government of legitimacy as well as the moral authority to enforce any law against citizens. It is even more disheartening when the law in question is one aimed at fostering transparency and accountability in government and where the government involved is one that claims to be championing a war against corruption.”
Mr. Sulaimon said MRA was extremely concerned that despite an earlier induction of the Commission into the FOI Hall of Shame about two years ago in which the organization highlighted its various transgressions, the Commission had made no effort to improve on its performance in the implementation of the FOI Act and had continued to operate in total disregard for the Law.
According to him, given these circumstances, MRA had no other option but to take legal steps to compel the Commission to comply with its obligations under the Act in accordance with the provisions of the Law.
Ayo Midele/Editor
*JOIN our alert's group | Share stories with us | Advert placement: WhatsApp | SMS: +2348033592762 *Twitter: @ITREALMS *Email: itrealms.dsa@gmail.com*
FOI Programme Manager at MRA, Mr. Ridwan Sulaimon, said despite its responsibility of overseeing a huge federal civil service, the Commission has ignored virtually all its duties as a public institution as defined by the FOI Act, thereby consistently sending a wrong signal to other public institutions under its supervision with the result that, unsurprisingly, many of those public institutions and their officials have themselves repeatedly violated the provisions of the Act.
Noting that the Commission was established by section 153(1) of the 1999 Constitution(as amended) as a federal executive body empowered to appoint persons to offices in the federal civil service and to dismiss or exercise disciplinary control over persons holding such office, Mr. Sulaimon said: “This is a huge responsibility that requires the Commission, which essentially serves as the engine room of the government, to be transparent in order to protect its integrity and enjoy credibility with those it superintends over as well as to comply with all applicable laws and regulations so that it can enforce these and others laws and regulations with respect to the public institutions and officials under its supervision.
According to him, “The Commission can have no credibility in exercising disciplinary control over members of the public service for breaches of relevant laws and regulations and its efforts in this regard cannot be effective when it is itself in breach of its duties and obligations under a Law validly made by the National Assembly. The hypocrisy in such an exercise will be a major encumbrance to the performance of the Commission’s functions and the realization of its objectives.”
Mr. Sulaimon accused the Commission of failing to proactively publish the range of information and documents that it is required to disclose by the Law; refusing to designate an FOI Desk Officer; not providing the appropriate training for its officials on the public’s right of access to information and for the effective implementation of the Act; and consistently neglecting to submit to the Attorney-General of the Federation its annual FOI implementation reports, all of which are mandatory requirements of the Law.
He stressed that it was evident from the website of the Commission that it is in breach of the requirements of section 2(3)f of the FOI Act which imposes an obligation on all public institutions to proactively publish the title and address of the appropriate officer to whom applications for information under the Act should be made by members of the public.
Mr Sulaimon said: “Such level of impunity should not be tolerated in any decent society and it amazes us that a government that expects ordinary citizens and its officials to obey the law allows an institution of the government with such massive coordinating and supervisory roles to get away with such blatant disregard for a valid and subsisting law, thereby presenting an image of a lawless society and a government that condones lawlessness.”
He added that: “An approach to governance in which government officials and institutions disobey the law, sets a bad example for ordinary citizens and robs the government of legitimacy as well as the moral authority to enforce any law against citizens. It is even more disheartening when the law in question is one aimed at fostering transparency and accountability in government and where the government involved is one that claims to be championing a war against corruption.”
Mr. Sulaimon said MRA was extremely concerned that despite an earlier induction of the Commission into the FOI Hall of Shame about two years ago in which the organization highlighted its various transgressions, the Commission had made no effort to improve on its performance in the implementation of the FOI Act and had continued to operate in total disregard for the Law.
According to him, given these circumstances, MRA had no other option but to take legal steps to compel the Commission to comply with its obligations under the Act in accordance with the provisions of the Law.
Ayo Midele/Editor
*JOIN our alert's group | Share stories with us | Advert placement: WhatsApp | SMS: +2348033592762 *Twitter: @ITREALMS *Email: itrealms.dsa@gmail.com*
Wednesday, August 29, 2018
Temenos unveils learning community engine to banks, enhanced change - ITREALMS
The banking software company, Temenos has unveiled the Temenos Learning
Community (TLC) Engine, the latest addition to the TLC training suite, reports ITREALMS.
TLC Engine, ITREALMS gathered, helps banks to reduce
operational risk and costs, monitor their regulatory compliance better, and
increase staff engagement; it could be deployed on the cloud or on premise and
integrates seamlessly with Temenos banking software products, and could also be
integrated to third party systems, which a bank may be using.
TLC Engine is specifically designed for banks, to serve as a foundation for change management and training activities. With TLC Engine, financial institutions can record, update and cascade their unique business processes, using the Temenos Standard Operating Procedures (TSOP) as a basis. TLC Engine can then utilize these processes to support the ongoing training of staff across all of a bank’s organization. TLC Engine also enables banks to train, test and certify their teams in Temenos software solutions, offering access to the official Temenos content and certification processes found across the Temenos Learning Community suite of products.
Following the launch, Byblos Bank, the third largest bank by assets in Lebanon, became one of the first clients to sign for the new offering. Lebanon-based Byblos Bank is a leading financial institution with operations in Armenia, Belgium, Cyprus, France, Iraq, Nigeria, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom. Byblos Bank will use TLC Engine to help drive and support change in its current digital transformation project that is delivering a new, upgraded Temenos T24 core banking platform.
Raffoul Raffoul, AGM and Head of Group Organization Development, Information System & Operational Support at Byblos Bank, commented: “The need for digital change is greater than ever to cope with a rapidly changing marketplace. The speed at which we need to deliver change and new functionality demands the need for an online training solution. Signing for the TLC Engine to ensure success and drive change as part of our transformation project was an obvious choice. With the platform, we are able to prepare for each phase of implementation, and down the road ensure that our employees continue to be educated on best practices and new solutions. We will use TLC Engine to intelligently link technologies and incorporate business processes to implement technology in the most optimal way for our needs.”
TLC Engine is specifically designed for banks, to serve as a foundation for change management and training activities. With TLC Engine, financial institutions can record, update and cascade their unique business processes, using the Temenos Standard Operating Procedures (TSOP) as a basis. TLC Engine can then utilize these processes to support the ongoing training of staff across all of a bank’s organization. TLC Engine also enables banks to train, test and certify their teams in Temenos software solutions, offering access to the official Temenos content and certification processes found across the Temenos Learning Community suite of products.
Following the launch, Byblos Bank, the third largest bank by assets in Lebanon, became one of the first clients to sign for the new offering. Lebanon-based Byblos Bank is a leading financial institution with operations in Armenia, Belgium, Cyprus, France, Iraq, Nigeria, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom. Byblos Bank will use TLC Engine to help drive and support change in its current digital transformation project that is delivering a new, upgraded Temenos T24 core banking platform.
Raffoul Raffoul, AGM and Head of Group Organization Development, Information System & Operational Support at Byblos Bank, commented: “The need for digital change is greater than ever to cope with a rapidly changing marketplace. The speed at which we need to deliver change and new functionality demands the need for an online training solution. Signing for the TLC Engine to ensure success and drive change as part of our transformation project was an obvious choice. With the platform, we are able to prepare for each phase of implementation, and down the road ensure that our employees continue to be educated on best practices and new solutions. We will use TLC Engine to intelligently link technologies and incorporate business processes to implement technology in the most optimal way for our needs.”
Dale Thomas, Director of The Temenos Learning Community said: “The key to a project’s success is staff engagement, knowledge, and ability to use the new system to its full potential. With the launch of this new platform, we are bringing to new and existing clients easy-to-access knowledge of our products and technology, as well as personalized support from our experienced change management team. We are delighted that the launch of TLC Engine is accompanied by extending of our relationship with Byblos Bank, a long-term client of Temenos. We are already very proud to be helping Byblos Bank to deliver its upgrade project, and now to support the Bank in creating and implementing a change management program with TLC Engine.”
Uj. N. Dominic/GEE
Thursday, May 03, 2018
Enhanced Cooperation: What’s next after WGEC2.0?
Ordinarily
when you review the phrase“Enhanced Cooperation,”it should reflect the etymology of the two words “enhanced” and “cooperation” to indicate that a measure of existing cooperation is being
taken to the next level. Yes, this is the intention of the architects of the
language to avoid an imminent deadlock at the World Summit on Information
Society (WSIS) in Tunis, 2005.
The
European Union (EU) who has successfully used many forms of cooperation to
achieve tremendous success over years came to the rescue when countries
demanded that they join the US in its historical oversight role on the
management of the Critical Internet Resources (CIRs); Internet Address names,
numbers and protocol parameters.
It
can be recalled that the United States (US) provided initial research funding
that resulted in the global networks of networks called the Internet which is
managed by interest-motivated volunteers across the US and later the rest of
the world. As the Internet became the cornerstone of any modern economy, and
governments in the late 1990s began to take note of this critical development
enabler, they began to express interest in the management of the Internet which
culminated in the convening of the 1st World Summit on Information
Society in Geneva in 2003; and due to inconclusive outcome scheduled another
round of Summit for 2005 in Tunis, Tunisia that produced the famous Tunis Agenda (TA).
In
the Tunis Agenda are reaffirmation of Action Lines and Targets
of the Geneva
Action Plan of WSIS 2003 with two important outcomes connected to the
management of CIRs namely the Internet
Governance Forum (IGF) and Enhanced
Cooperation (EC). While IGF convened immediately first in Greece in 2006
and every year till the last in Geneva in 2017, Enhanced Cooperation track
could “not take-off” as
envisaged due to different interpretations by UN member states of the meaning
of “Enhanced Cooperation” and the nature of mechanism for its implementation.
I
had the privilege to speak though remotely at the 1st United Nations
Commission on Science and Technology for Development (UN CSTD) consultative
forum on Enhanced Cooperation on International Public Policy Issues pertaining
to the Internet in 2012, where I reflected as a matter of fact that EC has been
on-going for years even at the bedrock of the Internet.
Without
sustained cooperation, networks cannot be built talk-less of network of
networks. I also indicated that in the government circle, government has
increasingly continued to cooperate on diverse public policy issue pertaining
to the Internet. Issues like cybersecurity and cybercrime have seen governments
collaborating through Interpol, OECD, EU, G7, etc with positive outcomes like
the Budapest
Convention on Cybercrime and more recently on the upcoming General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in
Europe.
While
some stakeholders including governments maintained that EC was already taking
place, other governments indicated that EC according to paragraphs 69 to 71 of
the TA was yet to begin. The consultation on EC in 2012 led to the convening of
the first Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation by a resolution of
the UN General Assembly (GA) (paragraph 20-21) asking the Chair of CSTD to
establish the WG which convened between 2013 and 2014.
Composed
of 22-nation representatives according to UN representation process and 5
representatives each from business, civil society, academic and technical
communities; and International organizations with previous hosts of IGFs; the
WG could not agree to produce a consensus report due to just one controversial
issue - how governments on an equal footing can make decisions on international
public policy matters pertaining to the Internet viz-a-viz CIRs. Based on the
work of a correspondence group, the WG produced evidence that EC has
increasingly been on-going among governments and other stakeholders.
On
the strength of increasing evidence of cooperation on International public
policies issues pertaining to the Internet, the GA by a resolution in 2015
asked the Chair of CSTD to once again convene another WGEC with the hope of
finding a consensus position on the intractable Tunis Agenda outcome.
By
the time the WG was to meet in September 30, 2016, the United States Government
(USG) had wisely in 2014 announced and begun a process to relinquish its unique
oversight function on the Internet. USG
said it was in continuation of a planned process begun in 1998 that saw to the
creation of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), a
private sector-led US registered not-for-profit organisation focused on serving
global public interest in ensuring a stable, secure and resilient Internet. The
USG through its agency, the National Telecommunication and Information
Administration (NTIA) of the Commerce Department as part of its condition to
the global Internet community indicated that it would not subscribe to any
government led replacement to its oversight role.
ICANN
based on the mandate given by NTIA led the world to produce an acceptable
proposal to NTIA that convinced the USG to abandon its oversight function on
the Internet on October 1, 2016. This event was like a miracle because a young
US Official once told me in Geneva that“I don’t see USG relinquish this role in my life-time.”
USG
relinquished its oversight function on the Internet but yet some governments
still wanted paragraph 71 implemented to the letter. Most private sector
(business, civil society, academic and technical community) and Western
Countries including Japan posited that nations can exercise their public policy
sovereignty within their borders but not on International Internet public
policy issues (IIPPI). But come to think of it, what is wrong if governments on
an equal footing have a mechanism to discuss IIPPI? Nothing is really wrong and
that was why I proposed for adoption at the WGEC2.0 for the CSTD to continue to
provide the platform for governments to discuss IIPPI with full participation
of other stakeholders since the CSTD already has in its mandate the
responsibility to discuss and make recommendation on public policy issues to
the GA through the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC).
This
was to be the consensus agreement as many Western countries that hitherto
objected to the idea later embraced it in the spirit of compromise.
Unfortunately, a handful of countries (e.g. Saudi Arabia) opposed the idea
insisting the only idea they supported was the creation of a new Institutional
mechanism in the likes of ITU
or UNESCO to handle IIPPI. A vast
majority did not support the creation of new Institutional mechanism because:
1. the nature of the Internet (which is distributive) does not concentrate
control on one entity and 2. it would be expensive considering cost cutting
measures within governments across the world not least the United Nations itself.
WGEC2.0
met eight times for 3 days each in Geneva over a 2-year period (2016-2018)
under the distinguished chairmanship of Ambassador Benedicto Fonseca of Brazil, who did from my
perspective an outstanding job of co-ordination to the effect that even with
high tensions many times and eventual failure of consensus recommendation, all
participants remained cordial, hopeful and appreciative of his efforts. The
CSTD Secretariat also worked tirelessly and impressively to support the work of
the WG.
Nevertheless,
the WG agreed on the characteristics of EC including transparency, inclusivity,
collaboration, effectiveness, sustainability, responsiveness, peace etc but its
failure to agree a position by consensus on paragraph 71 torpedoed many other
positive conclusions of the WG.
Perhaps the next line of action is for the subject
of EC to continue to be a subject line item on the schedule of the CSTD
whenever its convenes its annual meeting. CSTD already has such mandate within
its statute anyway.
For
me, it has been a great learning experience and a privilege representing
business and participating at the cutting edge of global Internet public policy
debate as the first African business person in two high profile UN Working
Groups and on the same footing with states.
*Contributed by Jimson Olufuye, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Kontemporary Konsulting, Chairman, Africa ICT Alliance, AfICTA and one of
the 5 global business representatives to WGEC 1.0 & 2.0.
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
ISOC seeks input into CSTD-Working Group on enhanced cooperation
The Internet
Society is seeking inputs of its global members into the United Nations (UN)
Commission on Science and Technology for Development's Working Group on Enhanced
Cooperation (CSTD WG EC), reports ITRealms.
Constance
Bommelaer of Internet Society, hinted ITRealms that the formation of this group was one
of the outcomes from the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS +10) review
conducted last year.
As its
precedent, Bommelaer said this review has its basis in the Tunis Agenda, where
the notion of "enhanced cooperation" is developed in paragraph 69.
You'll remember that this text established a distinction between the day-to-day
operations of the Internet and Internet public policy issues. But various
interpretations have been made, hence the ongoing debate over the past decade.
According to
her, at the heart of the issue are very different views on whether
"enhanced cooperation" is specifically about enhancing the role of
governments in Internet governance, or whether it's about enhancing cooperation
among all stakeholders, including governments.
To this end,
she said, ISOC supports the latter, which has to do with stakeholders including
government, “where we have a broad, inclusive understanding of ‘enhanced
cooperation’.
The current
consultation opportunity, she said, involves all Internet stakeholders hereby invited
to share their thoughts with the UN on two questions: What are the high level
characteristics of enhanced cooperation?
In addition, she
said, taking into consideration the work of the previous WGEC and the Tunis
Agenda, particularly paragraphs 69-71, what kind of recommendations should we
consider?
Nenye Dom/GEE
ITREALMS ... everything news digitally!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

