" ITREALMS

Friday, June 08, 2012

How tech-giants promote child-labour


Over the past decade, consumer electronics have become a cornerstone to most people across the world and if they are like most Nigerians, they probably own a cell phone, computer and at least one television, but the question no one seems to be asking is ‘Where do all these gadgets come from?’
It would amaze you to know that these electronics products are manufactured in some of these cities, namely Reynoza in Mexico; Jaszerbereny and Polgar in Hungary; Chennai in India; Hanoi in Vietnam; and Pathum Thani in Thailand, but some of the leading electronics makers may have contributed adversely to impoverishing the world children, through child labour.
Some of the beneficiaries of this situation include Samsung, Apple, General Electronics, Nokia, Motorola, Dell, Panasonic and dozens more, who are direct or indirectly contributing to child labour at the countries where they have assembling plants, based on poor wage apart from poor working conditions.
It was also discovered that 36 per cent of all children under 14 were employed in manufacturing during the period under review, while the average work day for each child is 10 hours.
According to a recent research by Jen Rhee, a Master student, an estimated 90 per cent of American adults live in a household with at least one cell phone, 59 per cent of American adults own a desktop computer, 52 per cent own a laptop computer; while 96 per cent of American households have at least one television and more than half of homes have at least three.
Additionally, the report says that China is responsible for one third (1/3) of the global electronics manufacturing, wondering, however, where the other 2/3 come from?
In view of the research, DigitalSENSE News discovered that five manufacturing plants produce bulk of the world’s television sets, computers, cell phones GPS systems, tablets, and cameras that populate homes, invariably for various brands and aforementioned brands precisely.
These electronics products, the research added were produced. Reynoza in Mexico; Jaszerbereny and Polgar, Hungary; Chennai, India; Hanoi, Vietnam; Pathum Thani, Thailand, maintaining that 36 per cent of all children under 14 were employed in manufacturing as at the time of the research, while the average work day for each child is 10 hours.
Remarkably, estimated at the report stated that after explosions at an Apple supplier plant in China in 2010, many of the company’s factories came under scrutiny.
“Of 127 Chinese Apple supplier plants audited in 2010, 80 had not properly stored or handled hazardous chemicals; 41 did not dispose of hazardous waste as required by law; 37 did not monitor and control air emissions and 11 had waste water problems,” part of the report conducted under MastersDegree.net read.
They pointed out that when other gadget suppliers were examined, it became clear that Apple did not fall far from the tree and companies like Samsung, General Electronics, Motorola, Nokia, Dell, Panasonic, and some more from these manufacturing capitals have extremely poor wages.
On daily average, the report says wages range between $8.9, about N1,403.08 to $190, about N29,953.50, citing for instance that the United States tops the factory cities with $190 followed by Jaszerbereny and Polgar in Hungary  with $13.3; Hanoi - $3.3, Reynosa - $4.52, Pathum Thani $7.19 and Chennai - $8.9.
“These companies don’t just pay poorly, they’ve also been found to employ children (child labour); face threats of suicide; face employee protests and be negligent in handling waste; as poor working conditions allow you to get your gadgets a little cheaper, but is it worth it?”
 Remmy Nweke

ITREALMS Online ... delivering news for ICT4D

IPv6 Fact Sheet


Introduction
Internet Protocol (IP) addresses are the unique numeric identifiers assigned to every computer or device that is connected to the Internet. So while we use names, for example, www.icann.org, to identify ICANN’s website, the computers themselves don’t actually talk to the name, they talk to the unique number associated with that name. That number is the IP address.
The original Internet Protocol, IPv4, was developed in the early 1980s and served the global Internet community for more than three decades. IPv4 had a capacity of just over four billion IP addresses, which was enough for the experiment that the Internet started as in the 1980s. But IPv4 is a finite space, and after years of rapid Internet expansion, the pool of available unallocated addresses for IPv4 has been fully allocated to Internet services providers (ISPs) and users.
Only 3.7 billion IPv4 addresses are usable by ordinary Internet access devices. The others are used for special protocols, like IP Multicasting. Today, none of those 3.7 billion IPv4 addresses remain unallocated.
There are almost seven billion people on the planet, and many of those people want to have more than one device that has network connectivity. That’s why we need IPv6, the next generation of the Internet protocol that has a massively bigger address space than IPv4. Compared to IPv4’s 32-bit address space of four billion addresses, IPv6 has a 128-bit address space, which is 340 undecillion addresses—that’s not a number you hear every day!
Over the past year, major content providers and access networks have started offering IPv6 services to ordinary Internet users.
Because IPv6 is so large, it should last us considerably longer than the 30 years we have gotten so far got from IPv4. ISPs generally assign many thousands of network segments, called a /64, to a single subscriber connection at home, school, or business. Giving every person on Earth a connection with a /48 would barely dent the available IPv6 address space.
In fact, while the Earth’s orbit around the Sun is only big enough to contain 3,262 Earths, it would take 21,587,961,064,546 Earths like ours to use all the addresses in the part of the IPv6 space we now use. That's a lot of addresses for a rapidly growing Internet!
What Do IP Addresses Look Like?
Those numbers in IPv4, the fourth version of the Internet protocol, look like this: 192.0.2.53. IPv6 addresses are written in hexadecimal, which can fit more information into fewer digits. Colons separate the segments of IPv6 addresses instead of dots; for example, 2001:0db8::53. In fact, when you see two colons side by side in an IPv6 address, you know that all the segments between them contain only zeros. You would have to expand the example address to 2001:0db8:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0053 without those colons.
How are IPv6 Addresses Distributed?
IP addresses are distributed in a hierarchical system. As the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions operator, ICANN allocates IP addresses to the five Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) around the world, and the RIRs then allocate smaller IP address blocks to ISPs and other network operators.
From there, the ISPs and other Internet operators assign the addresses to the individual Internet connections used by most computer users.
ICANN’s Board of Directors ratified the policy governing the allocation of IPv6 address space to RIRs in September 2006. The key policy elements are:
·         RIRs receive IPv6 blocks in /12 units
·         RIRs can receive an additional block when they have used 50 percent of their existing allocation.
·         The number of /12 units RIRs receive is based on a formula established by IANA.
What is a /12 unit?
A /12 is a block 1,048,576 times the size of the minimum allocation made by RIRs to ISPs and other network operators. Some ISPs run very large networks and receive blocks thousands of times larger than the minimum, but a /12 allows for at least tens of thousands of allocations to organizations running networks before the block is fully allocated.
To give you a sense of how many IP addresses are in a /12 block: All five RIRs were allocated a /12 of IPv6 address space in 2006. As of the end of 2010, none of them had requested additional address space.
The Policy details
The IPv6 policy contains a formula for determining when an RIR qualifies for additional IPv6 address space and how much it can receive. To qualify for additional IPv6 address space, the RIR must have less than 50 percent of a /12 left, or it must not have enough space to meet its members’ needs for the coming nine months.
Defining the variables
The variables in the policy’s formula are available space and necessary space. All an RIR’s IPv6 address space is considered available for allocation unless it is a reservation that will expire within the next three months, or is fragmented.
The policy’s formula considers recent history and future projects to determine how much address space an RIR might need in the future. The formula works this way: First, simple averaging is used to determine the number of addresses allocated per month during the past six months. This average helps determine how much space an RIR is expected to need in the near term. If the RIR’s available space  is not enough for the next nine months of allocations, the RIR qualifies for additional address space.
Special needs
The policy also allows special facts to be taken into account when calculating how much additional IPv6 address space an RIR qualifies to receive. They might apply if there was a new regional policy or external factors “such as new infrastructure, new services within the region, technological advances or legal issues.”
In all cases, the RIR must explain the change in consumption rate or the impact of the new policy, or must provide an analysis of the external factors. If an RIR’s data is not sufficiently clear, it can be questioned.
The calculation
Once this information is collected, the calculation can go forward:
Necessary Space=Average Number of Addresses Allocated Monthly during the Past 6 Months x Length of Period in Months
Although each RIR provides all these data to ICANN’s IANA Department with its request, most of the data are published every day in a standard format log file, and are mirrored on the IANA FTP site. But whether the calculation is done by ICANN staff or by an observer, using the data published by the RIRs makes calculating the results simple. The numbers can be entered in a spreadsheet that calculates how much space the RIR qualifies for based on the formula.
Who Sets These Policies?
These distribution policies are developed in the RIRs’ regional public policy forums. The process is very similar to the consensus-based, bottom-up approach used to develop other ICANN policies, which are typically guided by ICANN’s supporting organizations. The RIRs allocate addresses to ISPs and other network operators according to the policies developed in these public policy forums in which representatives from industry, governments and civil society participate.
These forums are open to participation by anyone with access to email. Discussions happen via open, archived mailing lists and at open meetings. RIR membership is not required to fully participate in the policy development process. Any individual can submit a global policy proposal. The proposal can be submitted to an individual RIR’s policy-making process, like any other regional policy proposal, or they can be submitted directly to the Address Supporting Organization Address Council (ASO AC). The ASO AC is the body that makes sure a global policy proposal has properly reached consensus in all five RIR regions before the proposal is sent to the ICANN Board of Directors to be ratified.
The ASO AC can be contacted through the addresses listed on its web site at: http://aso.icann.org/contact/.
Are the Internet and its technology ready for the transition to IPv6?
Most of the existing systems that we are using today actually support IPv6 already. So the laptops that we have in front of us support IPv6 and have done so for quite some time. IPv6 is not dramatically different on the network from IPv4, and those machines that we were using 30 years ago were capable of IPv4. So if the kind of computers that were running thirty years ago could run IPv4, then pretty much any cell phone (or probably pocket calculator) could run IPv6 today, if you really wanted it to.
How can I get IPv6 connectivity?
If you’re an average home user, it’s up to your ISP to initiate the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 on your network. In most cases, you won’t have to do anything. If you are required to change something, such as your Internet router, your ISP will let you know.
Which RIR runs the open policy forum for my region?
RIRs serve regions of roughly continental scope, with one RIR per continent. A list of regions and places served can be found on the NRO web site at http://www.nro.net/about-the-nro/regional-internet-registries.
Where can I find out more about IP address management?
podcast about IPv6. You can read its transcript at http://icann.org/en/learning/transcript-icann-start-05-29apr10-en.pdf.
More information about IP address management can also be obtained from ICANN, the RIRs and the Address Supporting Organization’s Address Council:
·         http://www.icann.org
·         http://www.nro.net
·         http://aso.icann.org



ITREALMS Online ... delivering news for ICT4D

Buyright Africa redeems May 7 promise


One of the winners receiving his prize
Buyright Africa.com, a new Tech savvy conglomerate, has redeemed its promise to give mini laptops to the first 50 visitors to its website at 7am on its launch date the 7th of May, 2012.
Communications Advisor to the company, Mr. Echika Ezuka, said the lucky winners received the laptops from the Buyright Africa Dotcom offices in Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt, Owerri, and Kano.
The Managing Director of Buyright Africa, Mr. Emomine Mukoro said during one of the presentations in Lagos, that the innovative launch was the first of its kind in Africa and came with a strong promise of providing partnership platform to existing and future ICT companies in resolving funding issues for ICT projects, ICT equipment ownership scheme and reduction of total cost of ownership, namely computers, printers, scanners, projectors, consumables, ICT equipment leasing and many more.
Mr. Mukoro confirmed that Buyright Africa has a partnership with strong international finance group to assist Africans realize their technology dream and enjoy the benefits of emerging technologies.
He said that Buyright Africa has been designed to create technology capacities that would allow our citizens, governments and businesses compete favorably with other strong economies of the world.
“It comes with a strong mandate to partner with international and local ICT companies to fund and deliver major ICT projects in the public and private sectors,” he said, stressing that Buyright Africa, would focus on the educational sector with the intention of providing world class facilities for teaching and learning at flexible payment plans spread up to three years.
Mukoro further listed the following international and local partnering Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) including HP, Dell, Samsung, Toshiba, Cisco, Zinox, APC, Mercury, Microsoft to name a few.
One of the winners, Dr. Popoola Tomorin of Momoh Memorial Hospital, Oyo, said in his response after the presentation that initially he thought that the competition was one of those scams that characterize the internet.
He was, however, pleasantly surprised when he received the SMS inviting him to Lagos to receive the prize, just as he expressed gratitude to Buyright Africa Dotcom for the integrity of the entire exercise.
Another winner, Keji Akinbode, a student of Lagos State University, LASU, said that he considered himself very lucky to win in the Buyright Africa competition, stressing the fact that the mini laptop would help him in his academics while Aliyu Abdul Jalal, equally another winner who works with the National Universities Commission (NUC) described the promo as unbelievable and worthy of emulation.
In her remarks, Buyright Africa’s Head of Marketing, Mrs Loretta Agbakoba, urged all winners who have received SMS to go to the nearest Buyright Africa Dotcom office and collect their prizes.
 Remmy Nweke
 
ITREALMS Online ... delivering news for ICT4D

Juwah explains NCC’s interest in corporate governance

Dr. Eugene Juwah, EVC, NCC
The Executive Vice Chairman (EVC), Nigerian Commissions Commission (NCC), Dr. Eugene Juwah has given some insights why the Commission choose to host a forum on corporate governance.
Juwah who was represented at the occasion in Lagos by the Executive Commissioner, Stakeholders, Mr. Ifeanyi Itanyi, in his address, last weekend, noted that the essential elements under this consideration include the organisational know-how, managerial talent and compliance with standards, processes and procedures of players in the telecommunications sector.
"We would like to start by first looking at compliance with standards and, in particular, processes and procedures from which every other corporate governance question is simply a derivative," he said.
NCC, he said, is particularly critical of regulatory failure that could arise from negligence of those organizational responsibilities.
This disposition, he said, goes further concerning the sharing of infrastructures and in the efficient use of other scarce resources in its market regulation efforts.
"This now leads us to the concept and practice of corporate governance," he declared.
Juwah cited the Sir Adrian Cadbury, the Ethics Prize Winner’s definition of corporate governance, which places demands on NCC to setup and continuously monitor the ethical framework within which those who run telecommunications companies in Nigeria should operate.
"Responsibility for decisions, therefore, will run through both ends of the spectrum, that is, the board and management," he said, stressing that operating companies have to take account of its responsibilities to industry in decision making, but the industry, through the regulator, has to accept its responsibilities for setting the standards against which those decisions are made.
Therefore, he revealed the reason behind the forum, saying it’s expected to shape the behavioural relationships through which telecommunications companies are directed and controlled.

Remmy Nweke

ITREALMS Online ... delivering news for ICT4D

How GSM operators shared N1.17bn



As the May 25 deadline for the payment of the penalties on four operators of Global System for Mobile (GSM) communications in the country, to the tune of N1,170,000,000 elapse, subscribers across all the affected networks are clamouring for the benefit to trickle down.
DigitalSENSE News recalls that on Friday, May 11, telecom regulator, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) sanctioned mobile service providers, namely MTN Nigeria, Etisalat, Airtel and Globacom over poor Quality of Service (QoS) in the preceding two months of March and April, 2012.
According to NCC, MTN and Etisalat, would pay N360,000,000 each, while Airtel pays N270,000,000, just as Globacom pays N180,000,000 of which they are to pay on or before May 21, 2012 or be liable to payment of additional N2,500,000, per day for as long as the contravention lasts.
Noteworthy is that NCC says the current penalties signal a new regime of quality of service management in the Nigerian telecommunications industry as promised by the leadership of the Commission under Dr. Eugene Juwah.
This penalty, NCC ascribed to poor quality of services rendered to the different subscribers on the aforementioned networks in the months of March and April 2012, as stated by the Head, Media and Public Relations at NCC, Mr. Reuben Muoka, and the details of the penalties were already communicated to the different operators.
This indicated that MTN Nigeria Communications and Etisalat, would pay the sum of N360,000,000 each while Airtel pays the sum of N270,000,000, even as Globacom got the least of the penalty in the sum of N180,000,000 of which they were to pay on or before May 25, 2012 or be liable to payment of additional N2,500,000, per day for as long as the contravention persists.
The fines was a result of the contravention of the provisions of the Quality of Service Regulations by the Nigerian Communications Commission as the operators failed to meet with the minimum standard of quality of service including the key performance indicators (KPIs).
The Commission, he said, has in line with the provisions of the regulation, monitored the performance of the operators on the different parameters as provided and the result showed that the service providers  are in contravention of the provisions.
He said, paragraph 13 and Schedule 3 Paragraph 2 of the Quality of Service Regulation 2012, stipulate that any company which contravenes this provision will be liable to pay fine as to the tune of N15,000,000.00 for each parameter for a service contravened in the month of March, 2012.
NCC said that a further sum of N2, 500,000 is attracted for each parameter for a service for each day the contravention continued throughout the month of April, 2012.
DigitalSENSE News confirms that in the letter communicating the penalties to the different operators,  signed by the Director, Legal and Regulatory Services, Ms. Josephine Amuwa, and the Head of  Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement, Engr. Ubale Maska, the Commission noted the performances in the months of January and February 2012 as being below the specified thresholds, “however, for the purpose of enforcement of the new Quality of Service Regulations, the Commission had taken these periods as grace period.”


Remmy Nweke

ITREALMS Online ... delivering news for ICT4D